eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications
Share:
Send email
Share:
Original paper

Incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable biosprosthesis in patients with bicuspid aortic valves

Hakan Süygün
1
,
Hacı Ahmet Kasapkara
2
,
Murat Can Güney
3
,
Melike Polat
3
,
Engin Bozkurt
4

  1. Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Karaman Training and Research Hospital, Karaman, Turkey
  2. Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
  3. Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Atılım University, Medicana International Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
  4. Department of Cardiology, Medicana International Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Adv Interv Cardiol 2024; 20, 3 (77):
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.142240
Online publish date: 2024/08/13
Article file
- incidence (1).pdf  [0.14 MB]
Get citation
 
 
1. Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Jilaihawi H, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1696-704.
2. Reinöhl J, Kaier K, Reinecke H, et al. Effect of availability of transcatheter aortic-valve replacement on clinical practice. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2438-47.
3. Vahl TP, Kodali SK, Leon MB. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement 2016: a modern-day “through the looking-glass” adventure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67: 1472-87.
4. Babaliaros V, Devireddy C, Lerakis S, et al. Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed in the catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach) versus hybrid operating room (standard approach) outcomes and cost analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 898-904.
5. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1609-20.
6. Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, et al. Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 1321-31.
7. Thyregod HGH, Steinbrüchel DA, Ihlemann N, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: 1-year results from the all-comers NOTION randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65: 2184-94.
8. Forrest JK, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, 4-Year outcomes of patients with aortic stenosis in the evolut low risk trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82: 2163-65.
9. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in low-risk patients at five years. N Engl J Med 2023; 389: 1949-60.
10. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1890-900.
11. Mylotte D, Lefevre T, Søndergaard L, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 2330-9.
12. Yoon SH, Bleiziffer S, De Backer O, et al. Outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69: 2579-89.
13. Reddy G, Wang Z, Nishimura RA, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for stenotic bicuspid aortic valves: systematic review and meta analyses of observational studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 91: 975-83.
14. Mangieri A, Tchetchè D, Kim W, et al. Balloon versus self-expandable valve for the treatment of bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: insights from the BEAT international collaborative registrys. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13: e008714.
15. Moscarella E, Mangieri A, Giannini F, et al. Annular size and interaction with trans-catheter aortic valves for treatment of severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: Insights from the BEAT registry. Int J Cardiol 2020; 349: 31-8.
16. Nazif TM, Dizon JM, Hahn RT, et al. Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the PARTNER (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER Valves) trial and registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: 60-9.
17. Members ATF, Brignole M, Auricchio A, et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 2281-329.
18. Hamdan A, Guetta V, Klempfner R, et al. Inverse relationship between membranous septal length and the risk of atrioventricular block in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: 1218-28.
19. Sievers HH, Schmidtke C. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: 1226-33.
20. Perlman GY, Blanke P, Dvir D, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: favorable early outcomes with a next-generation transcatheter heart valve in a multicenter study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9: 817-24.
21. Magyari B, Kittka B, Goják I, et al. Single-center experience with the balloon-expandable myval transcatheter aortic valve system in patients with bicuspid anatomy: procedural and 30-day follow-up. J Clin Med 2024; 13: 513.
22. Delgado-Arana JR, Gordillo-Monge MX, Halim J, et al. Early clinical and haemodynamic matched comparison of balloon-expandable valves. Heart 2022; 108: 725-32.
23. Yuan SM, Yuan AH. A comparison of neurological event and mortality rates between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement. Adv Interv Cardiol 2023; 19: 202-8.
24. Szotek M, Drużbicki Ł, Sabatowski K, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and cardiac conduction abnormalities: prevalence, risk factors and management. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 6056.
25. Tokarek TA, Dziewierz A, Sorysz D, et al. The obesity paradox in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is there any effect of body mass index on survival? Kardiol Pol 2019; 77: 190-7.
26. Jilaihawi H, Chen M, Webb J, et al. A bicuspid aortic valve imaging classification for the TAVR era. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 9: 1145-58.
27. Kawamori H, Yoon SH, Chakravarty T, et al. Computed tomography characteristics of the aortic valve and the geometry of SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018; 19: 1408-18.
28. Maeno Y, Abramowitz Y, Kawamori H, et al. A highly predictive risk model for pacemaker implantation after TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10: 1139-47.
29. Keßler M, Gonska B, Seeger J, et al. Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the Lotus valve. Am Heart J 2017; 192: 57-63.
30. Tawara S. Das Reizleitungssystem des Säugetierherzens: eine anatomisch-histologische Studie über das Atrioventrikularbündel und die Purkinjeschen Fäden: Fischer 1906.
31. Siontis GC, Jüni P, Pilgrim T, et al. Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 129-40.
32. Auffret V, Puri R, Urena M, et al. Conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: current status and future perspectives. Circulation 2017; 136: 1049-69.
33. Barbanti M, Gulino S, Costa G, et al. Pathophysiology, incidence and predictors of conduction disturbances during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Expert Rev Med Devices 2017; 14: 135-47.
34. Becker M, Blangy H, Folliguet T, et al. Incidence, indications and predicting factors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a retrospective study. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2017; 110: 508-16.
35. Piazza N, de Jaegere P, Schultz C, et al. Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 1: 74-81.
36. Hamdan A, Nassar M, Schwammenthal E, et al. Short membranous septum length in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis increases the risk of conduction disturbances. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2021; 15: 339-47.
37. Hokken, TW, Muhemin, M, Okuno, T, et al. Impact of membranous septum length on pacemaker need with different transcatheter aortic valve replacement systems: the INTERSECT registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2022; 16: 524-30.
38. Hein‐Rothweiler R, Jochheim D, Rizas K, et al. Aortic annulus to left coronary distance as a predictor for persistent left bundle branch block after TAVI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 89: 162-8.
39. Miśkowiec D, Lipiec P, Szymczyk E, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and its impact on aortic diameters – a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. Echocardiography 2018; 35: 667-77.
Copyright: © 2024 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.