Biology of Sport
eISSN: 2083-1862
ISSN: 0860-021X
Biology of Sport
Current Issue Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Archive Ethical standards and procedures Contact Instructions for authors Journal's Reviewers Special Information
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Relative age effect across the talent identification process of youth female soccer players in the United States: Influence of birth year, position, biological maturation, and skill level

Laura Finnegan
1
,
Mirelle van Rijbroek
2
,
José M. Oliva-Lozano
2
,
Rick Cost
2
,
Matthew Andrew
3

  1. Football Research Group, Department of Sport and Exercise Science, South East Technological University, Ireland
  2. United States Soccer Federation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  3. Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Manchester Metropolitan University Institute of Sport, Manchester, UK
Biol Sport. 2024;41(4):241–251
Online publish date: 2024/05/17
Article file
- 22_03664_Article.pdf  [1.05 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. FIFA. Setting the Pace. FIFA benchmarking report women’s football [online]. 2022. Available from: https://digitalhub.fifa. com [Accessed June 2nd, 2023].
2. Williams AM, Ford PR, Drust B. Talent identification and development in soccer since the millennium. J Sports Sci. 2020; 38(11–12):1199–1210.
3. Okholm Kryger K, Wang A, Mehta R, Impellizzeri FM, Massey A, McCall A. Research on women’s football: A scoping review. Sci Med Footb. 2021:1–10.
4. Curran O, MacNamara A, Passmore D. What about the girls? Exploring the gender data gap in talent development. Front Spo Act Living. 2019; 1:3.
5. Cobley S, Baker J, Wattie N, McKenna J. Annual age-grouping and athlete development: A meta-analytical review of relative age effects in sport. Sports Med. 2009; 39:235–256.
6. Røsten S, Sæther SA, Aspvik NP, Bjørndal CT. Embedded, embodied, enculturated, and enabling processes: The identification and evaluation of sporting talent by ice hockey coaches in Norwegian youth national teams. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2023; 1(1):1–11.
7. Leyhr D, Bergmann F, Schreiner R, Mann D, Dugandzic D, Höner O. Relative age-related biases in objective and subjective assessments of performance in talented youth soccer players. Front Sport Act Living. 2021; 3:664231.
8. Finnegan L, Richardson D, Littlewood M, McArdle J. The influence of date and place of birth on youth player selection to a National Football Association elite development programme. Sci Med Footb. 2017; 1(1):30–39.
9. Dugdale JH, McRobert AP, Unnithan VB. “He’s just a wee laddie”: The relative age effect in male Scottish soccer. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:103.
10. Smith KL, Weir PL, Till K, Romann M, Cobley S. Relative age effects across and within female sport contexts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2018; 48:1451–1478.
11. Andrew M, Finnegan L, Datson N, Dugdale JH. Men are from quartile one, women are from? relative age effect in European soccer and the influence of age, success, and playing status. Children. 2022; 9(11):1747.
12. Barreira J, Bueno B, Chiminazzo JGC. Relative age effect and age of peak performance: An analysis of women’s football players in the Olympic games (1996–2016). Motriz: Rev de Edu Física. 2021; 27.
13. Ribeiro E, Barreira J, Carraco D, Galatti L, Götze M, Cal Abad CC. The relative age effect in under-17, under-20, and adult elite female soccer players. Sci Med Footb. 2023:1–8.
14. Delorme N, Boiché J, Raspaud M. The relative age effect in elite sport: The French case. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009; 80(2):336–344.
15. Teoldo I, Machado V, Casanova F, Cardoso F. Talent map of female soccer: How does the birthplace and birthdate impact the participation of soccer players in Brazilian Serie A1 Championship?. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2023: Press-Press.
16. Romann M, Fuchslocher J. Influence of the selection level, age and playing position on relative age effects in Swiss women’s soccer. Tal Dev Excel. 2011; 3(2):239–247.
17. Li Z, Mao L, Steingröver C, Wattie N, Baker J, Schorer J, Helsen WF. Relative age effects in Elite Chinese soccer players: Implications of the ‘one-child’ policy. PLoS One. 2021; 15(2):e0228611.
18. Sedano S, Vaeyens R, Redondo JC. The relative age effect in Spanish female soccer players. Influence of the competitive level and a playing position. J Hum Kinet. 2015; 46:129–137.
19. Brustio PR, Boccia G, De Pasquale P, Lupo C, Ungureanu AN. Small relative age effect appears in professional female Italian team sports. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 19(1):385.
20. Matsuda S, Ishigaki H. Trends in Relative Age effects of top-level female soccer players: A Japanese study. Percept Mot Skills. 2023; 130(3):984–998.
21. Götze M, Hoppe MW. Relative age effect in elite German soccer: Influence of gender and competition level. Front Psychol. 2021; 11:587023.
22. Brustio PR, Modena R, Boccia G, Vogliazzo M, Kelly AL. Youth-to-senior transition in women’s and girls’ football: Towards a better understanding of relative age effects and gender-specific considerations. PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0283781.
23. Baker J, Schorer J, Cobley S, Bräutigam H, Büsch D. Gender, depth of competition and relative age effects in team sports. Asian J Exe Sports Sci. 2009; 6(1):1–7.
24. Romann M, Fuchslocher J. Influences of player nationality, playing position, and height on relative age effects at women’s under-17 FIFA World Cup. J Sports Sci. 2013; 31(1):32–40.
25. Bennett KJ, Vaeyens R, Fransen J. Creating a framework for talent identification and development in emerging football nations. Sci Med Footb. 2019; 3(1):36–42.
26. Allison R, Barranco R. ‘A rich white kid sport?’ Hometown socioeconomic, racial, and geographic composition among US women’s professional soccer players. Soccer Soc. 2021; 22(5):457–469.
27. Ford PR, Bordonau JLD, Bonanno D, Tavares J, Groenendijk C, Fink C, Gualtieri D, Gregson W, Varley MC, Weston M, Lolli L, Platt D, Di Salvo V. A survey of talent identification and development processes in the youth academies of professional soccer clubs from around the world. J Sports Sci. 2020; 38(11–12):1269–1278.
28. Korgaokar AD, Farley RS, Fuller DK, Caputo JL. Relative age effect among elite youth female soccer players across the United States. Sport Mont. 2018; 16(3):37–41.
29. Romann M, Javet M, Fuchslocher J. Coaches’ eye as a valid method to assess biological maturation in youth elite soccer. Tal Dev Excel. 2017; 9(1):3–13.
30. Smith KL, Scarfone S, Chittle L, Horton S, Dixon JC. Confusion reigns: An analysis of responses to US soccer age cut-off date policy change. Front Sports Act Living. 2021; 3:635195.
31. Padrón-Cabo A, Rey E, García-Soidán JL, Penedo-Jamardo E. Large scale analysis of relative age effect on professional soccer players in FIFA designated zones. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2016; 16(1):332–346.
32. Cohen J. Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112:1155–1159.
33. Augste C, Lames M. The relative age effect and success in German elite U-17 soccer teams. J Sports Sci. 2011; 29(9):983–987.
34. Pedersen AV, Aune TK, Dalen T, Lorås H. Variations in the relative age effect with age and sex, and over time-elite-level data from international soccer world cups. PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0264813.
35. Vincent J, Glamser FD. Gender differences in the relative age effect among US Olympic Development Program youth soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2006; 24(4):405–413.
36. Ginés HJ, Huertas F, García Calvo T, Ponce-Bordón JC, Figueiredo AJ, Ballester R. Age and maturation matter in youth elite soccer, but depending on competitive level and gender. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3):2015.
37. Sullivan J, Roberts SJ, Mckeown J, Littlewood M, McLaren-Towlson C, Andrew M, Enright K. Methods to predict the timing and status of biological maturation in male adolescent soccer players: A narrative systematic review. PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0286768.
38. Meylan C, Cronin J, Oliver J, Hughes M. Talent identification in soccer: The role of maturity status on physical, physiological and technical characteristics. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2010; 5(4):571–592.
39. Sweeney L, Cummin SP, MacNamara Á, Horan D. The selection advantages associated with advanced biological maturation vary according to playing position in national-level youth soccer. Biol Sport. 2023; 40(3):715–722.
40. Cripps AJ, Hopper LS, Joyce C. Coaches’ perceptions of long-term potential are biased by maturational variation. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2016; 11(4):478–481.
41. Malina RM, Martinho DV, Valentedos-Santos J, Coelho-e-Silva MJ, Kozieł SM. Growth and maturity status of female soccer players: A narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(4):1448.
42. Kelly AL, Wilson MR, Gough LA, Knapman H, Morgan P, Cole M, Jackson DT, Williams CA. A longitudinal investigation into the relative age effect in an English professional football club: Exploring the ‘underdog hypothesis’. Sci Med Footb. 2020; 4(2):111–118.
43. Wattie N, Cobley S, Baker J. Towards a unified understanding of relative age effects. J Sports Sci. 2008; 26(13):1403–1409.
44. Votteler A, Höner O. The relative age effect in the German football tid programme: Biases in motor performance diagnostics and effects on single motor abilities and skills in groups of selected players. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014; 14(5):433–442.
45. Webdale K, Baker J, Schorer J, Wattie N. Solving sport’s ‘relative age’ problem: A systematic review of proposed solutions. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2020; 13(1):187–204.
Copyright: Institute of Sport. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.