facebook
twitter
ISSN: 1734-4948
Advances in Rehabilitation
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original article

Core stability exercises versus diaphragmatic release on respiratory functions on physical therapists with low back pain

Sumaya Serageldin Abdel-Aziz
1
,
Nagwa Mohamed Hamed Badr
2
,
Hatem Mohamed El-Azizi
3
,
Rehab El Sayed El Sawy
4
,
Alaa Mohamed El-Moatasem
2

  1. Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Disorders & Geriatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Benha University, Egypt
  2. Department of Cardiovascular/Respiratory Disorders & Geriatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt
  3. Department of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
  4. Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt
Advances in Rehabilitation
Online publish date: 2024/12/18
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Introduction
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) affects 69.1% of Egyptian physical therapists (PTs), causing discomfort, alterations in lung capacity and diaphragm mechanics. Previously, studies declared that core stability exercises and diaphragmatic release improved CLBP and respiratory functions. This comparative study covers the research gap by demonstrating which of these methods is more effective regarding respiratory functions and CLBP management.

Material and methods
90 female PTs with CLBP were randomly assigned to three equal groups: Group A (Core Stability Exercise), Group B (Diaphragmatic Release), and Group C (Control). All participants received a standard protocol that included ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hot pack. The primary outcome measures included pulmonary function tests assessed by spirometer, diaphragm excursion and thickness measured by diagnostic ultrasound. The Oswestry Disability Questionnaire interpreted the secondary outcome measure; the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).These outcomes were assessed and compared before and after the intervention.

Results
Groups A and B revealed significant improvements in the primary outcomes (p < 0.001), however, diaphragmatic excursion improved more in Group B, while diaphragm thickness was more enhanced in Group A. All groups exhibited a significant reduction in ODI scores (p < 0.001), with Groups A and B showing the most pronounced decreases. Clinically, this signifies the use of both therapeutic methods to optimize pain alleviation, pulmonary and diaphragmatic function in CLBP individuals.

Conclusions
The resulted intergroup variation regarding diaphragm thickness and excursion, endorses the combination of core stability exercises with diaphragmatic release techniques to alleviate pain, enhance respiratory functions and core strength in CLBP subjects.

keywords:

Abdominal drawing-in maneuver, Oswestry disability index, Pressure biofeedback unit, Pulmonary functions, Work-related low back pain











Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.