Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Reviewers
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Instructions for authors
Publication charge
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
abstract:
Original article
Core stability exercises versus diaphragmatic release on respiratory functions on physical therapists with low back pain
Sumaya Serageldin Abdel-Aziz
1
,
Nagwa Mohamed Hamed Badr
2
,
Hatem Mohamed El-Azizi
3
,
Rehab El Sayed El Sawy
4
,
Alaa Mohamed El-Moatasem
2
Advances in Rehabilitation
Online publish date: 2024/12/18
View
full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Introduction
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) affects 69.1% of Egyptian physical therapists (PTs), causing discomfort, alterations in lung capacity and diaphragm mechanics. Previously, studies declared that core stability exercises and diaphragmatic release improved CLBP and respiratory functions. This comparative study covers the research gap by demonstrating which of these methods is more effective regarding respiratory functions and CLBP management. Material and methods 90 female PTs with CLBP were randomly assigned to three equal groups: Group A (Core Stability Exercise), Group B (Diaphragmatic Release), and Group C (Control). All participants received a standard protocol that included ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and hot pack. The primary outcome measures included pulmonary function tests assessed by spirometer, diaphragm excursion and thickness measured by diagnostic ultrasound. The Oswestry Disability Questionnaire interpreted the secondary outcome measure; the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).These outcomes were assessed and compared before and after the intervention. Results Groups A and B revealed significant improvements in the primary outcomes (p < 0.001), however, diaphragmatic excursion improved more in Group B, while diaphragm thickness was more enhanced in Group A. All groups exhibited a significant reduction in ODI scores (p < 0.001), with Groups A and B showing the most pronounced decreases. Clinically, this signifies the use of both therapeutic methods to optimize pain alleviation, pulmonary and diaphragmatic function in CLBP individuals. Conclusions The resulted intergroup variation regarding diaphragm thickness and excursion, endorses the combination of core stability exercises with diaphragmatic release techniques to alleviate pain, enhance respiratory functions and core strength in CLBP subjects. keywords:
Abdominal drawing-in maneuver, Oswestry disability index, Pressure biofeedback unit, Pulmonary functions, Work-related low back pain |
|